|
I have decided to place the follow picture at the top of this page, because it encapsulates the whole theme of this page: sacred serpents. Painting: "Nagas" by Elli Crocker (Thanks Elli, for doing this painting. It is truly marvelous!) Prologue: Most of us native English-speakers are at least somewhat familiar (if not very familiar) with the serpent/dragons in the Judaeo-Christian Bible (What I shall call, "the JCB". "But, there is only 1 serpent-dragon mentioned in the JCB," you say. "Wrong! There were three." See: 1. LUCIFER: Lucifer is the name of the SERPENT in the Garden-of-Eden Allegory. However, Lucifer was not really a serpent, but rather one of the Elohim-Gods, who was symbolized as a serpent. Why was the serpent symbol chosen? Some scholars have speculated that, in the case of LUCIFER, the serpent represented knowledge. I disagree. I shall NOT tell you now what the LUCIFER serpent actually represented... not at this point. The answer will be somewhere near the bottom of this page. [Parenthetically, I think it is important to acknowledge the facts: (1) the early church leaders, especially after it became a state religion under the rule of Constantine, changed a lot of things in the Bible, to suit their own ends; (2) Then, the church leaders declared the so-called 'word of God' infallible... the Holy Bible being the so-called 'word of God'. Yeah, right. That's like me declaring that I am a prophet of God, and you cannot dispute that I am a prophet of God, because whatever I say is true. So, if I am a prophet of God, because I say I am, and a prophet would not lie, then I must actually be a prophet of God.] The name 'Lucifer" literally means: light bearer. Light has always, even today, been a metaphor for knowledge. When we read the Adam-and-Eve Allegory with knowledge in mind, we may see Lucifer in a different light. I know I have. What did Lucifer do that was so bad? He elucidated (i.e., enlightened) Eve about the functions of the tree of life (male body) and the tree of knowledge of good and evil (female body). Had he not done so, it is conceivable that Adam and Eve would still be in the Garden of Eden, living in paradisiacal bliss, childless. That's right.... childless. Why is it, then, that the Gods (i.e., Elohim, which is plural), did not want Adam and Eve to know about their own bodies? What is the deal? What's up with that? If you are a Christian, you must have come up with some justification for this conundrum. The Mormons have the perfect answer for this. The Jehovah's Witnesses (J.W.s) criticize Adam and Eve for their decision to disobey the Gods and procreate. I say, that they are ludicrous! Had Adam and Eve NOT disobeyed the Gods, we would not be here; But, that is assuming one wishes to take the whole Adam and Eve thing literally. The MORMON doctrine, J.W. doctrine, and the doctrines of all Christendom are completely ludicrous, because they take literally what was meant as an allegory. The bottom line is that the Lucifer-serpent symbol is understandable. All one needs to do is seek, and he/she shall find. 2. BEHEMOTH: While some scholars (or I should write "most scholars") seem to think that Behemoth was/is a hippopotamus, I vehemently disagree. The description of the beast in JOB, does not match that of a hippopotami at all! And, while I admit that snakes do not eat grass, I am inclined to believe that the symbolism was that of a serpent. 3. LEVIATHAN: It is commonly agreed by all that Leviathan was a sea-dwelling serpent or dragon (as it is clearly stated so in the JCB). Isaiah equates Leviathan with the Devil, but by the time Isaiah was born the true meaning of Behemoth and Leviathan may have been lost. Behemoth and Leviathan: in Scripture
And why should such knowledge be hidden? I don't know. But, it was. And the knowledge was lost to the Hebrews. I, Leon, have verily discovered this hidden knowledge. Shall I share it? Not now. You'd never believe me.
Comparative/Contrastive
Table of
FOOTNOTES: 1. Color-code Legend:
Pictures (pics) of Serpents/Dragons
Article: "The Cosmic Serpent"
Tarot and Serpent Symbolism:
Notice the coiled
serpent (bottom, front, center) of the #6 Tarot Card. Also notice the twins
just behind the coiled serpent. Also, notice that the number six, itself
has important significance in
Go ahead and copy these pics. I don't mind. Just give me credit for the ones I drew.
Leon's Essays on the Topic of Serpents First Essay: "Serpents: Enemies or Allies?" Q: How does one account for some religions having enemy serpents (the female being the bad and the male being the righteous) ; AND, for some religions having allied serpents in their mythology???A: I don't. I c ould make and educated guess, but that's all it would be.MY GUESS is that being ENEMIES actually symbolized the oppositeness of the serpents, one male and one female, and being ALLIES actually symbolized the union of the male haploid DNA strand & the female haploid DNA strand, which initiated the creation of life!CONCLUSION No matter what, I'm convinced that the serpents symbolized the union of the male haploid and female haploid DNA strands into one. Why they had to be either enemies or allies is a mystery to me. The only exception to the
male-female "rule" would be Quetzalcoatl (and his MALE twin).
The part in this hue of greenish blue is very interesting to me, because it ties the serpent with FERTILITY. Interestingly, another article from the Wikipedia website, entitled, "Snakes in Mythology", describes another tie-in to FERTILITY:
WOW! AND THE SERPENT-FERTILITY ASSOCIATION DOESN'T END THERE... In the Hindu Religion, (especially in Southern India) intertwined serpents are the symbols of fertility; And, jewelry (such as is depicted below) is made to ensure the fertility of the wearer.
NOW, WE KNOW WHY. DON'T WE? I FIND THE FOLLOWING PICTURE INTERESTING BECAUSE THE SERPENT IS INTERTWINED THROUGHOUT THE 'TREE OF LIFE':
Second Essay - "The Single Serpent Vs. The Double Serpent" Humans are composed of two 'serpent-like' things, which we now refer to as 'DNA strands'. Each strand makes (composes) 23 chromosomes (see number 23 in numerology). The 23rd chromosome is the "sex" or "gender" chromosome (this is highly significant, and you'll see why if you see my numerology page). One serpent (strand) comes from a male human (via spermatozoa), and one serpent (strand) comes from a female human (via ova). Humans are therefore in essence double-serpent beings. Yet, there is a life-form, consisting of only one serpent. It is called a virus. Viruses are single DNA strands, that reproduce by infecting double serpent bodies and "stealing" their DNA, in order to replicate, causing havoc for the double-serpent beings, sometimes even killing the double serpent beings. Now, being "armed" with this new perspective or insight, it is expedient to read from Genesis:
It is written, "dust shalt thou eat". "Adam" means "dust" in the Hebrew language. And since the humans were created of the dust of the earth, it means that the viruses would eat us: HUMANS, i.e., the double-serpent beings! It is written: "...between thy seed and her seed". Do viruses have "seed"? Yes! Like I mentioned above, viruses replicate (have seed) by stealing our DNA! It is written: [God speaking to the serpent] "...it [the seed of the woman] shall bruise thy head". Do viruses have heads? No. So, this is clearly another metaphor. The head is considered the most vital part of the body. Without it, we die. When we lose a limb, we most likely won't die (provided medical attention is given), but if we lose our head, no amount of medical attention will bring us back to life. Thus, it means that the double-serpent beings would be able to KILL the single-serpent beings. It is written: [God speaking to the serpent] "...thou shalt bruise his [the seed of the woman]'s heel." Unlike the head, the heel is not a vital part of the body. Thus it means that the single-serpent beings would only be able to do minimal damage to humans. It should be known that most viruses do not kill. HIV doesn't kill, either. But, what it does is it attacks the immune system so that the double-serpent beings cannot fight other bacteria and viruses that attack the body. It would seem that the single-serpent beings have found our "Achilles' heel"!!!
Third Essay: "The HINDU & GREEK Serpent-DNA Connection" Hindu religion is the oldest religion still remaining on this planet, and it has an interesting perspective on Serpent Symbolism.
Source: ProbertEncyclopaedia Also, there is an interesting story in Greek mythology. Evidently, Delphi (which means womb or navel) was the "center" of the world (and quite possibly the birthplace of human beings). There was a huge dragon/serpent called "Python", which was the protectorate of "mother earth" (Gaia). Python almost killed Apollo's mother, and as a result Apollo killed the Python. [That's a very abbreviated version of the story, by the way]. The parallel between the Greek Python and the Norse Jormungand is fascinating, isn't it?!!! (Jormungand was allegedly a single serpent sent by the gods to afflict humans). It is also fascinating to note that Aesculapius (the father of medicine), was the son of Apollo. And Hygieia (the goddess of health) and Panaceia (goddess of healing) were the daughters of Aesculapius. What we have here are 3 generations of healers! I suggest that the Python was a virus, which almost killed Apollo's mother. He eradicated the virus through an adept use of medical science. Then, he passed his skills on to his son. It is also interesting to note that Aesculapius was reported to carry a staff with a carving of a serpent coiled around it, like this:
Now, compare these pictures of viruses to the Ancient Serpents:
It could the two-headed serpent of many ancient religions/cultures.
This the "T4" virus. Notice is has seven extremities. It could the seven-headed Hydra of Greek mythology, which was eventually killed by Hercules and his nephew. Interestingly, there is a seven-headed serpert (naga) of Buddhist lore. It was forbidden to enter Buddhist temples, and statues thereof adorn the exterior of Buddhist temples, as protectors thereof. Could it be that the statues served as a warning... that warning being that whoever enters here will be infected by a deadly virus? And only special personages were allowed to enter such temples. Could it be that those special personages had the antibodies to fight off said virus? Things that make you go: "Hmmmm." huh? Also, interestingly, the seven or nine-headed Hydra was the protector of Hera's Golden Apple Tree. Could it be that the fruit of the tree was infected with a deadly virus?
It could be the "coiled serpent" of many ancient religions/cultures. Check out this coiled serpent sculpture from ancient Mexico: (click here). Virus pics from here. FOURTH Essay: "Lucifer, Behemoth, and Leviathan" I gave my word at the beginning of this page that I would elucidate the significance of the 3 Biblical serpent symbols. I keep my word. And now that you have read this page in its entirety, it is more likely that you will believe me. Lucifer-Serpent: Symbol of his knowledge of DNA (much like the staff of Aesculapius was a symbol of his knowledge of DNA). Behemoth-Land-Serpent: Male gamete Leviathan-Serpent-of-the-Abyss: Female gamete The hidden secret of how the two "monsters" were divided in one day is quite simply: mitosis.
F IFTH Essay:"My Dream about a Dragon and a Winding Staircase" Several Years ago, I was writing a paper for my graduate studies at the University of Birmingham in the area of applied linguistics. My friend, Stephen, was also writing a similar paper for the same course. We got to talking about our assignments and the course contents. During one such discussion, the question came up: is the ability to learn and produce a language genetic or learned, i.e., is it hardware or software. Stephen said that he knew the answer, but that he wouldn't tell me. I'd have to figure it out for myself. So, I went out to have a smoke, for I think better with the stimulation from the nicotine. Five cigarettes later, I came back in and announced that I had solved the problem. Before I write the answer, let take you through the though process in my mind (so far as I can remember). I remember thinking that there must be some hardware, such as a mouth, a tongue, vocal cords, and so on. This is provided by the genes (DNA). Then, I remember thinking that hardware (such as that of a computer) is useless without instructions (software) to operate the hardware. So, it dawned on me that language ability comes BOTH from hardware AND software. BUT, I was faced with the problem of where the software came from. This was the hard part. I finally came to the conclusion that the DNA is a living, chemical program. That means that the software and the hardware are one in the same. They cannot be separated. It's like energy and matter. Energy and matter are actually the same thing. The fact that we have two words to describe the same thing shows the duality of all substance in the known universe. DNA is likewise dual in nature. The hardware IS the software, AND the software IS the hardware. Thus, learning to speak a language is analogous to "filling" in the blanks. If there is no existing word or expression to fill in the blank, a new word or expression must be created. The program has accounted for this contingency and humans seem to have a biological imperative to label all things, both concrete and abstract. After I solved that problem, I began to ponder more deeply the ramifications of this new found knowledge. It seemed that the genes might actually be intelligent... that they might be fully functioning organisms, living in communities that we call DNA strands. The fact that they can replicate themselves provides some support for this notion. Obviously, the more complex and populous the colony, the more complex the being created by the genes. Then, I got the notion that genes might actually be considered our creators, i.e., our gods. We, humans are merely organisms composed of zillions of minute organisms, who are our masters... our gods. So, when religionists say that God lives within each of us, they are more literal than they perceive themselves to be. When I read Narby's account (above), it reminded me of my previous ponderings, and I think that if we want to meet our makers, the way to do so, is NOT to die, but through the power of our own minds. We must enter an altered state of consciousness and "listen" to the gods within us, and hear what they have to teach us about ourselves and our environment. When we dream, we might be actually communicating with our own DNA. Thus, by paying attention to our dreams, we might be able to gain insights about ourselves. In fact, I now firmly believe this to be true. I am reminded of a dream that I had once. It is particularly relevant to this line of thought.
I had totally forgotten about that dream until I read Narby's account above. Now, I believe that I may have been in contact with my own DNA. Wow! This is truly amazing stuff. P.S. I call that dream (of mine) ', because of the similarities between my dream and Jacob's dream. Also, our circumstances were very, very similar when we had our dreams. In fact, after I had mine, I looked up Jacob's dream (never having read it before in my life), and was astonished at how similar the circumstance were that both led up to our dreams and which appeared in our dreams.The Actual 'Jacob's Dream': [12] And he dreamed, and behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it. BUT, I ALSO call this dream my 'OSIRIS DREAM', for I found this [from the Pyramid Texts]: "The gods who are in the sky are brought to you, the gods who are on earth assemble for you, they place their hands under you, they make a ladder for you that you may ascend on it into the sky, the doors of the sky are thrown open to you, the doors of the starry firmament are thrown open for you."
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Webmaster of King of the
Jungle
|